Statement on Behalf of John Eastman Regarding December 19 January 6th Committee Hearing

A criminal “referral” from a congressional committee is not binding on the Department of Justice and carries no more legal weight than a “referral” from any American citizen.  In fact, a “referral” from the January 6th committee should carry a great deal less weight due to the absurdly partisan nature of the process that produced it.

At its inception, the January 6th committee had the resources and mandate to make important contributions in the area of Capitol Security, Electoral Count Act Reform and other areas of potential legislation.  Sadly, this opportunity has been squandered in favor of concocting a pretend “criminal case” from pretend prosecutors designed to create political advantage for the Democratic Party and stigmatize disfavored political groups.  The American people have been ill-served by the January 6th committee and its members.
Related Posts

Understanding Child Pornography Laws: Differentiating Possession, Distribution, and Production Charges

In this article, we delve into the intricate landscape of child pornography laws, shedding light on the distinctions between possession, distribution, and production charges. As federal criminal defense lawyers, our goal is to offer informative content that helps you navigate these sensitive issues. Exploring the Legal Distinctions Between Possession, Distribution, and Production of Child Pornography 

Read This

Defending Your Rights
In Federal Court

Contact us Now

What Our Clients Have To say...

Top